This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Globalization, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Globalization on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.GlobalizationWikipedia:WikiProject GlobalizationTemplate:WikiProject GlobalizationGlobalization articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
@Kapsig10: I reverted your edit for three reasons I outlined in my edit summary. When you re-did the edit, I saw only one of the three addressed in your summary. Your edit still created a sentence fragment with stray markup in the article, and it still left some of the Slate stuff in, while removing things that didn't come from Slate. Both of these seem like mistakes even if Slate is not reliable. Furthermore, Slate *is* a reliable source according to WP:RSN, as I stated. A source's reliability is not determined by sitejabber, yelp, or any other place online; it is determined by on-wiki consensus using a variety of different types of evidence. In my edit summary, citing RSN was referencing that consensus.--MattMauler (talk) 11:52, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply