Talk:Aggressive-class minesweeper

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

A brilliant page. would like to see more on this.

This article has some problems. Namely the fact that is mostly about the history and/or development of minesweepers in general rather than specific information about this class of minesweepers. In fact I think most of the text in this article could go. I'll probably get around to it myself eventually, but I'm always appreciative of collaboration. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 16:59, 16 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Page review

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I added the infobox on the class (from the USS_Fearless_(MSO-442) page), and some general info about these vessels. As the second paragraph has nothing to do with this class proper, I believe it can safely be removed. --LHOON 14:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic