Talk:Agreement between Armenia and Azerbaijan respecting the District of Zanghezour/GA1

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Olympian (talk · contribs) 07:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 21:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply


I will review this shortly. IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. No issues found with prose. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). I was able to check Der Matossian 2020, Gerwarth & Horne 2012, Gharibyan 2014, and Hille 2010. I found no issues with these references but I was unable to access the other sources. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2c. it contains no original research. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. `IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall assessment. On hold until Olympian can address my feedback. I wasn't able to do as thorough of a source review as I normally would have but found no issues. The prose is understandable and no issues with NPOV. IntentionallyDense (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.