 | Ahmed Al-Kaf is currently a Football good article nominee. Nominated by OpalYosutebito (talk) at 14:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page. Short description: Omani professional football referee (born 1983) |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Ahmed Al-Kaf. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Ahmed Al-Kaf at the Reference desk. |
Wth XD
editI did think that Indonesian netizens would start vandalizing al-Kaf's Wikipedia article for its "unfair treatment". But to enwiki and even this talk page? Haha, I really can't believe it! ▪︎ Fazoffic ( ʖ╎ᓵᔑ∷ᔑ) 12:49, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- Never underestimate the power of Indonesian football fans - OpalYosutebito (talk) 12:51, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- They have guts, that I will admit! Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 13:46, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- The page has now been protected for 2 weeks. Babysharkboss2!! (I spread pro-Weezer propaganda) 15:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Ahmed Al-Kaf/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: OpalYosutebito (talk · contribs) 14:13, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 16:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
I'll take this review. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Just a couple of immediate concerns, though I'm more than willing to work with you on these.
- An active {{in use}} is not a great thing to have, and the article certainly can't pass GA with that still there. Ideally, that expansion would have been done before nominating the article for GA.
- I have a few NPOV concerns, specifically that a majority of the lead and a majority of the prose in the body of the article are both dedicated to his "controversies" and unpopular rulings. This seems to me to give undue weight to one particular point of view.
- More prose is needed in the "Career" section. Ideally, information which is present in the lead is also given (and cited) in the body of the article, so that you can leave citations out of the lead. In this case, a good chunk of the non-controversy information in the lead is not present in the body, and the vast majority of the "Career" section is just made up of tables.
- Overall, some more biographical information would be very helpful, as would less focus solely on criticism (see WP:CRITS)
If you want to give this some work, just ping me when you've taken care of these bullet points and I'll have a look at the prose and references. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 20:36, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
@OpalYosutebito: quick ping to make sure that you've seen this and are interested in moving forward. PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 16:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)