Talk:Ahmet Çalık

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Hakdemr in topic Remove and edit information
edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://web.archive.org/web/20150525193417/http://www.biyografi.info/kisi/ahmet-calik. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Note: archive.org doesn't show us whether the English translation was added to that page before or after it was added here, but that is immaterial – the text was in either case a translation of the pre-existing Turkish text. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:28, 16 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Remove and edit information

edit

On 10 September 2024, an article expansion and reference addition based on my research and references was pointlessly removed by user @CevikBilge with the explanation ‘False Information’. Dear @CevikBilge; Please raise your concern on the article talk page before attempting to remove the quoted content, please reach consensus on what you claim the references are contrary to.

Users @CevikBilge and @Berre2004 appear to have taken action only on this page. I think that possible vandalism, negative content and PR work such as reference removal. The users I mentioned above appear to have only made positive article edits.

Could you please investigate this issue by making the necessary investigation about the users concerned, regardless of right or wrong, and please investigate this issue before reversing the edit I have made? @Justlettersandnumbers

Sincerely... Hakdemr (talk) 11:42, 31 October 2024 (UTC)Reply