Talk:Ailene Fields

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Remaining issues for improvement

edit

The main unresolved question is the image copyright issue, as noted by User:Anon126 on User talk:Deleondnyc, which requires an update of the license on Flickr to either CC-BY-SA, or Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY). I suggest contacting Adam Fields, who posted the photo on Flickr and would be the one to change the license status on Flickr.

I backlinked this article to 3 other pages to remove Orphan status, and created 4 additional inline citations upon finding the published references at my local community college library. However, there were some questionable additional resources that I could not verify, which I deleted, and at least one citation that referred to an obvious mirror site, also deleted from the list.

Content is still somewhat thin. The article could be further improved/developed with info from published reviews and/or published interviews with the artist.

Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 03:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ailene Fields. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:27, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply