Talk:Ainsworths
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Gaius Tullius Cicero in topic Contentious
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ainsworths article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I removed
editCategory:Pseudoscience on the grounds that said epithet (a highly, and often unfairly, stigmatizing epithet, IMO) was redundant insofaras Category:Homeopathy was placed in Category:Pseudoscience. Okay?--Solomonfromfinland (talk) 02:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Contentious
editThe last section of the article is not neutral but polemical and intended to cast aspersions on homoeopathy, not provide factual information on the company Ainsworths. It therefore does not belong in an Encyclopaedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaius Tullius Cicero (talk • contribs) 00:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)