Talk:Air China Flight 129
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Accident
editFinal report in English is at http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20061017200424/http://152.99.129.24/eng/rct/Final%20report-English2005.4.15.pdf Appendices are at http://classic-web.archive.org/web/20061017200424/http://152.99.129.24/eng/rct/Appendix.zip (Archive) WhisperToMe (talk) 15:04, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Also at http://www.icao.int/FSIX/sr/reports/02000710_final_report.pdf (Archive) and http://www.skybrary.aero/bookshelf/books/549.pdf (Archive) - this is a copy of the Air China Final report in English It makes it clear that there is a Korean version, and that the Korean version takes precedence over the English version But where is a file of the Korean version? WhisperToMe (talk) 15:09, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
Also a copy at http://www.air-safety.com/415.pdf WhisperToMe (talk) 17:57, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
See if http://www.moct.go.kr/EngHome/News/view.php?MID=EM051&HOMEPAGENAME=&DEPT=&UID=&id=8&um=1&board=n_english_news archives... WhisperToMe (talk) 15:17, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
More stuff:
- "Boeing 767 Strikes Mountain During Circling Approach." Accident Prevention. Flight Safety Foundation. Vol. 62 No. 12. December 2005.
- "건설교통부, 중국국제항공공사 김해사고 관련 조사결과 발표." Newswire
Alternate URL
edithttp://web.archive.org/web/20061009063507/http://www.moct.go.kr/EngHome/News/view.php?MID=EM051&HOMEPAGENAME=&DEPT=&UID=&id=8&num=1&board=n_english_news is an alternate URL for the crash stuff - but neither the report itself nor the appendices were captured
http://www.moct.go.kr/portal.do May have been the MOCT homepage
WhisperToMe (talk) 22:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://152.99.129.24/* - From the KAIB domain the only actual .pdf archived was that of the English report. WhisperToMe (talk) 14:39, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Air China Flight 129. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for //152.99.129.24/eng/board/view.jsp?id=4
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:55, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Air China Flight 129. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.boeing.com/news/breakingnews/2002/020414g.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cbsnews.com/news/search-continues-at-korean-crash-site/
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6S75G3COG?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.china.org.cn%2Fenglish%2F2002%2FNov%2F49768.htm to http://www.china.org.cn/english/2002/Nov/49768.htm
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://legacy.icao.int/fsix/sr/reports/02000710_final_report.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:19, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Smithsonian channel
editYouTube has excerpt which has a tour guide causing delay by forgetting his passport, his group thus ending up in the rear of the plane and 90% of them surviving. Carlm0404 (talk) 15:52, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- Mayday is not considered a Wikipedia reliable source. You would something else for the article....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
- There's two types of information in these articles:
- Scientific, technical, and legal information: The producers of Mayday are not specialized in these fields, and one should replace citations to Mayday with citations to the original accident reports (where Mayday producers get their information anyway)
- Cultural and societal: These do not involve scientific information and so I think it's OK to cite Mayday for that.
- However I feel it is better to cite the "original" sources for the info. I'm almost certain that other publications reported on the misplaced passport. They might be Korean or Chinese ones.
- WhisperToMe (talk) 21:52, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
- There's two types of information in these articles:
Criminal prosection of the captain
editI could not find any info on whether or not the captain was charged with any crimes or what happened to him next. Does anyone know what happened? Tigerdude9 (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2018 (UTC)