Talk:Air quality index
Latest comment: 25 days ago by 2409:4089:298:D94F:0:0:2A8:F8B0 in topic Role of chemistry in resolving particulate matter in air.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Air quality index article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
More details on how the air quality index is Calculated Needed?--Sfitzsi (talk) 15:44, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
editIt might be useful to add more details concerning the air quality index for ozone. In the US, for 8 hour average ozone, with concentration in units of ppbv, the breakpoints table is:
Category | ||||
0 | 59 | 0 | 50 | Good |
60 | 75 | 51 | 100 | Moderate |
76 | 95 | 101 | 150 | Unhealthy for Sensitive Groups |
96 | 115 | 151 | 200 | Unhealthy |
116 | 374 | 201 | 300 | Very Unhealthy |
- I believe this information was provided earlier, as well as Canadian levels, but has been taken out. It is extremely salient, because US levels were changed in 2008 under Bush, and are under further scientific consideration now.
- The values shown above for the US seem to be as proposed by the EPA, not as currently effective.
Role of chemistry in resolving particulate matter in air.
editScience exhibition Project for class 8 2409:4089:298:D94F:0:0:2A8:F8B0 (talk) 07:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)