 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 November 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Notability
editHow is this article notable? Prsaucer1958 (talk) 01:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Notability is a subjective evaluation. Articles in an encyclopaedic work, such as Wikipedia aspires to be, should not be assessed on the basis of subjective evaluation. JohnArmagh (talk) 18:47, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, that's incorrect, articles must be notable to be included on Wikipedia. And there are processes and guideliness to assess notability. As you can see, I've nominated this article for deletion because of lack of notability. Feel free to contribute to the discussion at the AfD page.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:50, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
- Whilst you may be correct about Wikipedia's policy regarding notability, that does not alter the fact that the concept of notability is a subjective one, and that Wikipedia's policy of notability is therefore contradictory to its policy of NPOV - because subjectivity is fundamentally POV JohnArmagh (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2011 (UTC)