Talk:Al-Mu'tadid I

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 73.167.97.140 in topic Link to Arabic article

Disambiguation needed?

edit

Should there be some disambiguation note on this article, so that readers are not confusing with the more notable Al-Mu'tadid? - John Russ Finley (talk) 14:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Probably. Go ahead and add it. AndyBQ (talk) 17:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al-Mu'tadid I. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:22, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Link to Arabic article

edit

The link to the Arabic version of this article goes to Mu'tadid II instead of Mu'tadid I. I'm not sure how to correct that, so I am just letting you know. 73.167.97.140 (talk) 21:32, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Just noticed in the French version that this person is sometimes known as Mu'tadid II because the first by that name ruled in Baghdad. So never mind, my bad. 73.167.97.140 (talk) 21:34, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply