Talk:Al-Qarada raid

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 March 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

Islam Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Asia Low‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

untitled

Latest comment: 13 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

This is all COPYVIO from the ref. Which isn't even a good ref William M. Connolley (talk) 13:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

i believe i have fixed the copy vio. please check. --Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, pretty well the whole thing is a copyvio. You should know, since you created it :-). "polytheists" is a bit of a giveaway, no? William M. Connolley (talk) 21:24, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

The word polytheist is used in the source i used, the sealed nectar, anyway i am going to change it.--Misconceptions2 (talk) 21:31, 30 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

In reference to "Considered for Deletion" -- Please keep this article

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is a useful article that I was specifically seeking when I searched for it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HerbM (talk • contribs) 03:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Al-Qarada raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://military.hawarey.org/military_english.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110708231936/http://store.dar-us-salam.com/NW/004a.html to http://store.dar-us-salam.com/NW/004a.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:49, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic