Talk:Al Ewing
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Al's beard
editI've seen Al Ewing's beard, and it's rubbish. Alan Moore, now that's a good beard. Vizjim 12:10, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
Vizjim, I've not seen your beard but I think it is stupid. You are a stupid head. --Drgs100 (talk) 12:17, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
For the record I have also seen Al's beard and it is OK as far as beards go - I have seen better though.
Just so this has some context the first post was in response to [1] [2]. (Emperor (talk) 15:40, 7 October 2008 (UTC))
All is understood now. Alfred call the monkeys back.--Drgs100 (talk) 09:38, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Al =
editOK just to keep track, so far we have had:
- Alfred Robert Ewing
- Alasdair David Ewing
- Alvin Ewing
The last one sounding like an obscure cast member from Dallas. So, as much fun as the "Al is For..." game is (for the record, I had my money on "Alabama" although "Algonquin" and "Al-Iteration" have a certain appeal), it looks like we are going to need a source before we accept any further suggestions. (Emperor (talk) 02:33, 20 November 2008 (UTC))
Recent ?
edit2006 is hardly recent now, is it ? -- Beardo (talk) 21:19, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Al Ewing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090501130618/http://www.2000adreview.co.uk/site/index.php/Interviews/Writing-Dredd.html to http://www.2000adreview.co.uk/site/index.php/Interviews/Writing-Dredd.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070623222002/http://www.abaddonbooks.com/book_el_sombra.php to http://www.abaddonbooks.com/book_el_sombra.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130701051956/http://upcoming4.me/news/book-news/review-al-ewing-the-fictional-man to http://upcoming4.me/news/book-news/review-al-ewing-the-fictional-man
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050301092942/http://www.2000adreview.co.uk/features/interviews/2005/ewing/ewing.shtml to http://www.2000adreview.co.uk/features/interviews/2005/ewing/ewing.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:44, 6 January 2018 (UTC)