Talk:Al Gore 2000 presidential campaign

Latest comment: 9 months ago by 92.40.212.153 in topic Semi protected edit request on 3 February 2024

Bot report : Found duplicate references !

edit

In the last revision I edited, I found duplicate named references, i.e. references sharing the same name, but not having the same content. Please check them, as I am not able to fix them automatically :)

  • "kickoff" :
    • {{cite web |url=http://archives.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/09/04/campaign.wrap/index.html |title=Bush, Gore kick off fall campaign season with appeal to working families |accessdate= 2008-07-01 |author= |last=Ferullo |first= Mike |authorlink= |coauthors= |date=September 4, 2000 |work= |publisher= [[CNN]] }}
    • {{cite web |url=http://edition.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/10/16/rothenberg.column/index.html |title=Stuart Rothenberg: Gore, Bush hope third debate is the charm |accessdate= 2008-07-01 |author= |last=Rothenberg |first= Stuart |authorlink= |coauthors= |date=October 16, 2000 |work= |publisher= [[CNN]] }}

DumZiBoT (talk) 15:28, 9 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Congress

edit

Nothing is mentioned about how the Democratic Members of the House all signed a protest, contesting the election and attempting to force the election to the Congress itself. They needed ONE (1) signature of a Democratic Senator, but none signed.

While I personally hate Micheal Moore, he includes the news footage in fahrenheit 911.

If you read the Constitution, it provides for close elections to move to the House, and that's how a previous election was decided. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.80.228 (talk) 23:58, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Campaign Issues/Platform

edit

I came to the article trying to figure out the campaign issues and I find only a section about gays, etc. Did Gore not advocate for anything in his campaign? What was his counter to Bush's promises/advocacy? Mulp (talk) 17:24, 24 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

edit

See Template talk:Infobox officeholder#Use on articles other than the person articles about the inclusion of {{infobox candidate}} on pages like this one. -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:42, 19 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:BarbaraBoxer.png Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:BarbaraBoxer.png, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:39, 22 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Al Gore presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Al Gore presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al Gore presidential campaign, 2000. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:07, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please explain sentence about Cllinton

edit

Hello, I do not understand the following:

<<In making the announcement, Gore also distanced himself from Bill Clinton, whom he stated had lied to him.[16] In an interview for 20/20 Gore stated, "What he did was inexcusable, and particularly as a father, I felt that it was terribly wrong.">>

What was Gore referring to, about what did Clinton lie to Gore? I tried to find information about this in the previous paragraphs, without success. Could someone explain? :-) Ziko (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Semi protected edit request on 3 February 2024

edit

In an interview for 20/20 Gore stated, "What he did was inexcusable, and particularly as a father, I felt that it was terribly wrong." This isn't cited to anything and needs to be removed, particularly since it appears to violate WP:NPOV by presenting an overly critical view of Gore's opinion on President Clinton. 92.40.212.153 (talk) 20:10, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

This page is not protected – I have marked the request answered. Tollens (talk) 20:15, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Well, it's not really answered since it's not completed, but anyways. I can imagine I'm probably being annoying with all these edit requests, but I can assure you I'm trying to be a net positive to the encylopedia. How can I know if a page is locked so I can edit it myself? 92.40.212.153 (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I completely believe that you're trying to be a net positive. You should be able to check by looking in the top right corner of the article (by the edit and view history buttons) – there will be a padlock icon if the page is protected, like at Al Gore, and there won't be one if you can edit the article, like this one. Generally implementing changes on behalf of others is not preferred unless they are unable to do so for some reason, which is why I didn't make the edit – this is for a variety of reasons, including more complicated copyright requirements and the fact that it forces you to personally endorse the change. Tollens (talk) 20:25, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I see! Thanks for the help, and sorry for the general inconvenience, and if my tone is a little callous sometimes, I can assure you that's not my intention.. 92.40.212.153 (talk) 20:43, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply