Talk:Al Jackson Jr.

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 74.95.43.253 in topic Why "additional citations"?

Untitled

edit

I don't understand why Al Jackson Jr. is redirected to Al Jackson. I had thought he was called Al Jackson Jr. his whole life, not "Al Jackson." This is making it confusing about how to write other articles mentioning him. Also, some style guides do not put a comma before "Jr." these days, so I'm wondering what house style is here in case I do put "Jr." in. User:Bebop 05:50, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC) I wholeheartedly agree and came here with the intent of writing exactly what I found above! The man was never known as "Al Jackson" in his professional career, and I'm sure in deference to his father it is most appropriate to rename this page. --Tednor 14:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Aljackson1.jpg

edit
 

Image:Aljackson1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Death section

edit

The death section is all out of proportion to the rest of the article. Is is death the most important information about Al Jackson? MathewTownsend (talk) 18:05, 6 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Allmusic duplicate?

edit

This appears to be the same guy at Allmusic:

Anybody know how to report this to Allmusic? HTH HAND —Phil | Talk 09:28, 13 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Jackson as songwriter

edit

I have found no evidence to support the assertion that Al Jackson, Jr., was a songwriter. In The Complete Stax/Volt Singles, 1959–1968 he is listed as a co-writer of only two songs ("You Can't Get Away with It," recorded by Johnnie Taylor, and "Cold Feet," recorded by Albert King), apart from his contributions to recordings by Booker T. and the M.G.'s (which, strictly speaking, are not songs, because they have no lyrics). I can find no evidence that he co-wrote "Respect" or that anyone other than Otis Redding wrote the song. The assertion that Jackson wrote many other hits for Stax seems to be unfounded.

I suggest deleting all references to Jackson as a songwriter unless someone can give a convincing argument not to do so.

Jwicklatz (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC) Jwicklatz (talk) 06:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the statement that he co-wrote "Respect" (and others), but he's listed as co-writer on the record labels for "Let's Stay Together" and "I'm Still in Love with You" so those references remain. Whbjr (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

Equipment

edit

Two drum kits used by Jackson are on display in museums:

The Stax Museum in Memphis has a black Rogers Holiday kit that according to various sources around the Net was the studio kit in Royal Recording Studios (a k a Hi Recording Studio) in Memphis, which was donated to the museum by producer and arranger Willie Mitchell. Supposedly the Ludwig Acrolite snare on display was not part of the studio kit.

The Musicians Hall of Fame & Museum in Nashville has a (blue pearl?) Ludwig kit that was used in the Stax studio. It's complemented by a silver sparkle Rogers Powertone snare.

According to Steve Cropper, as quoted in 'Give the Drummer Some!' by Jim Payne, a grey pearl Rogers floor tom was used in the mix 'n' match kit at Stax. This floor tom (with B&B type tuning lugs) can be seen in the French 1969 documentary 'Le blues de Memphis'. The rack tom and bass drum appear to be Gretsch, and the snare possibly a Ludwig aluminum model.

Moreover Jackson holds a red sparkle Rogers Powertone snare in the cover photo of a Booker T. and the M.G.s record (Greatest Hits/The Very Best of).

155.4.205.100 (talk) 11:57, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Al Jackson Jr.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Why "additional citations"?

edit

Other than the "Collaborations" list, this article is barely more than a "stub". It has seven citations listed. Given the brevity of the article that seems like a quite sufficient amount. If some specific claim in the article appears to require an additional citation, it would be more useful to specifically flag that claim, rather than blanket-flagging the entire article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.95.43.253 (talk) 23:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply