Talk:Al Jadeed
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Al Jadeed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120419020754/http://mysat.tv/TVChannels/AlJadeed/tabid/126/Default.aspx to http://mysat.tv/TVChannels/AlJadeed/tabid/126/Default.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120628150431/http://my-tv.us/MainMenu/Products/Channels_List to http://www.my-tv.us/MainMenu/Products/Channels_List
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
Should this be deleted?
editLongstanding article about a TV station in a highly contested part of the world. Lots of allegations of murder, fraud, financing scandals, lawsuits but virtually no sourcing. It is certainly problematic to let something like this exist on what is supposed to be an encyclopedia.E.M.Gregory (talk) 16:28, 6 May 2018 (UTC)