Talk:Al Qarara Cultural Museum
Latest comment: 8 months ago by LaundryPizza03 in topic Relevance of mention of Church of Saint Porphyrius bombing
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | It is requested that an image or photograph of Al Qarara Cultural Museum be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
![]() | A fact from Al Qarara Cultural Museum appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 December 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PrimalMustelid talk 17:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Al Qarara Cultural Museum, housed in a former grain silo, contained 6000 years of history? Source: *"housed in a former grain silo" & "6000 years" in same article = https://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2021/0914/In-Gaza-a-museum-filled-with-history-picked-up-along-the-way
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Coins of the New Zealand pound
- Comment: I drew a bit of a black with the hook, so other suggestions are welcome
Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 16:16, 10 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Al Qarara Cultural Museum; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
- It's nice to have a new article about art and heritage to be able to review. This is a well-written article, which meets the length criterion and was nominated five days after its creation. The hook is properly formatted and combines two interesting facts, stated in the article and verifiable in the cited English-language source. Other factual claims can be verified by Google-translating the Arabic sources. The article is properly structured and carefully sourced with inline citations. The text is original; the one long quotation is properly attributed.
- It would be good to have more metadata about the sources and external links so readers know what they are clicking on. For example, both links could be attributed to Jinha agency and the auto-translated titles could be included. Similarly, the citations could show which news site they are links to. A query: the sentence "On 19 October, the Church of Saint Porphyrius was also destroyed in an airstrike." This fact needs to be connected to the rest of the article somehow. Is the church a neighbouring building to the museum? With these minor queries sorted out, the article will be ready. MartinPoulter (talk) 16:20, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for the kind review MartinPoulter, I've made the references more detailed - have I picked up what you spotted? Please let me know if there are other bits to improve. I've also added an intro to the destruction of the church - context is Gaza's cultural heritage being destroyed Lajmmoore (talk) 17:49, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
- The citations are much more usable now; thanks. The bit about the church has been removed by another user, but the article body text is still long enough without it, so this is good to go. MartinPoulter (talk) 22:12, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Relevance of mention of Church of Saint Porphyrius bombing
editI don't see any relevance between the two beyond being culturally significant sites that were bombed by the IDF. It could go into the 'see also' page but I don't think it deserves it's own sentence in the article. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:01, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed, removed. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:13, 28 December 2023 (UTC)