This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
I doubt it, at least not specifically -- they were both using stereotypically camp mannerisms, as was, for example, Liberace. Floatjon (talk) 05:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
(cur | prev) 15:51, 8 January 2014 172.2.44.170 (talk) . . (10,253 bytes) (+6) . . (Plse don't make stylist changes, which superimpose your personal preferences over the original author's. The reinstated changes reflect personal details intentionally included.) (undo)
Plse don't make stylist changes, which superimpose your personal preferences over the original author's. The reinstated changes reflect personal details intentionally included. -- this otherwise unexplained edit summary implies that others' stylistic changes are OK but mine are not. Quis separabit?18:21, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
These unexplained mass reversions have been reverted and will continue to be reverted until and unless they are satisfactorily explained, preferably on this talk page, although they appear to be in opposition to my removal of cruft and OR.
I believe this IP editor must understand that no one owns an article on Wikipedia and that good faith should be assumed. I do assume good faith on the part of this editor, insofar as he/she wishes to (re)make the article in what he/she believes to be a superior version, but mass reverts without explanation are not usually the right way to go. At least some of the contested editing should be illustrated on this talk page, at a minimum. If I am wrong about something I'll acknowledge it. Quis separabit?19:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
