Talk:Alan Sugar/Archives/2013

Enterprise Tsar

Sir Alan is to become Lord Sugar after getting a peerage as "Enterprise Tsar" (whatever that is) in Gordon Brown's recent reshuffle. His page will presumably become "Alan Sugar, Baron Sugar", therefore? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 13th Law Lord (talk • contribs) 12:14, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Given that these entries should be unbiased there should be some addition or editing to explain that whilst AMS enterprises have been financially or economomically successful the technology used and the products themselves did not enhance the users' quality of life or actually fit a user's need. (I say this as a Product Designer) Gonzophotojournalism (talk) 15:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Point 1 : Until his exact title has been gazetted, we would not change the name of the article. Point 2: This is a matter of opinion, which would need to be supported by very reliable sources, and might be better off in Amstrad, even if it could be supported. Rodhullandemu 15:23, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

American Enterprise Institute Sugar has been reportedly involved with certain members of the AEI with regard to technology development. He is currently under investigation regarding certain BT programming and the Rupert Murdoch/AMDOCS GLOBAL TELEPHONE HACKING SCANDAL. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.103.46.46 (talk) 22:21, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

~About the programme "The Apprentice"

Rather than just say that Alan Sugar "appears" in the programme The Apprentice, shouldn't this article say that Alan Sugar hosts the programme "The Apprentice" - this is what he is probably best known for doing in the United Kingdom? ACEOREVIVED (talk) 20:31, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Wrong Aircraft

I believe he flies an Cirrus SR22 aircraft, and NOT a Cirrus SR20 aircraft as stated. The SR22 is 310 HP and the SR20 is the less powerful 200hp version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.186.16 (talk) 16:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

I think you are right, certainly N124CP is registered as a Cirrus SR22. MilborneOne (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2013 (UTC)