Talk:Alan de Neville (landholder)
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic GA Review
![]() | Alan de Neville (landholder) has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 8, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Alan de Neville (landholder) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 22 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Alan de Neville (landholder)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kavyansh.Singh (talk · contribs) 16:26, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Nominator: Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) at 14:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
GA criteria
editGA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Comments
edit- Do we need that citation in the lead?
- "in Lincolnshire" — I'd say "in Lincolnshire, England"
- "He is easily confused" — often? or it it an English English thing?
- "Neville held lands" — The prose seems like a continuation of the lead. We should be mentioning his first name at his firs instance in the prose, and also "(floruit 1168)"
- "of Chief Forester" — my reading of MOS:JOBTITLE is that this should not be capitalized. Le me know if I am wrong.
- "The Complete Peerage entry" — 'The' is a part of the title: The Complete Peerage
That is pretty much all there is to say. Sourcing is impeccable. @Ealdgyth, I wouldn't formally put on hold unless you want me to. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- I'm going to be busy for the rest of the afternoon and evening, so can't promise I'll get to these before tomorrow ... so up to you on whether you want to put it on formal hold or not. I'm easy either way. Ealdgyth (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
- I think I got all these... Ealdgyth (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- Great, promoted. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 13:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
- I think I got all these... Ealdgyth (talk) 13:38, 8 March 2022 (UTC)