 | Alban Lafont has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 4, 2017. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alban Lafont article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Alban Lafont appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 June 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Alban Lafont/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
I should have this done by Sunday JAGUAR 11:36, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
- The lead needs to be expanded to summarise all of the article. At the moment it doesn't comply per WP:LEAD
- "He spent six years with Lattoise before signing with Ligue 1 side Toulouse in 2014." - this needs a citation
- "when a group of armed gunmen opened fire in a Cappuccino restaurant" - I don't think this needs italicising
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- No original research found.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
I'll leave this on hold until the lead can be expanded to summarise the article. Otherwise everything is OK. JAGUAR 18:20, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hi Jaguar, thank you for the review! I have expanded the lede as requested. Let me know if there are any other issues that pop up. Cheers, Liam E. Bekker (talk) 22:28, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing all of the issues! Most importantly the lead has been expanded to a suitable length so I think this should be good to go now. JAGUAR 10:05, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for addressing all of the issues! Most importantly the lead has been expanded to a suitable length so I think this should be good to go now.