Talk:Albany Research Center

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Copy and paste

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

While it is nice to add to the article, we generally do not copy & paste directly from other places. First, most of the time it would be a copyright problem. Secondly, it introduces problems, such as occurred here.

As to the copyright issue, since the agency is a federal government entity, there is a good chance the material is in the public domain, but we would need to confirm that. The ARC does apparently use contractors, and it is possible this was written by a contractor. But, odds are it is PD.

The second issue is actually the main problem. When you copy and paste, it often creates problems with out neutral point of view, which it certainly does. Not to mention we would never write "We are now known as NETL-Albany". We don't use we, as this is not the NETL-Albany's website (ditto with "our"). We would write: The laboratory became NETL-Albany in 2XXX. Here, we also avoid the "now" as we try not to leave statements that can age quickly. Additionally, all that information concerning the name already existed in the article (in the preceding paragraph), so I fail to see a need to repeat it.

Back to the NPOV issue; we would avoid terms such as "unique" and "leader", especially when coming from the entity we are writing about. Analysis about the lab needs to come from third party sources. Which is what I did last year when I re-wrote most of the article, using most if not all of the usable information from that same NETL source, which appears as footnote #1. If you need more information or more of an explanation, please let me know. Aboutmovies (talk) 06:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

No this should be plenty for now, still got alot to learn about how things all work but I will see what I can do to pull up additional sourses for information on it and get it from a third party to get the information in a NPOV formate.MathewDill (talk) 09:08, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Albany Research Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:02, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic