Talk:Albert Brunner/Archive 1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Icewhiz in topic Notability
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Albert Brunner. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Notability
Does not meet WP:SOLDIER & sig RS coverage not found link, just passing mentions.
No de.Wiki article.
Please also see a note at MilHist Talk Archives for background behind the redirect. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Notable due to his status as a Flying ace with a high claimed kills counts. As you can see in List of World War II flying aces - flyers with a much smaller kill count have articles - with the notability being their kill count and nothing else. Being an aerial ace (with a significant count for a particular conflict - 5 would be borderline for WWII, but would confer significance in any other conflict - mid-double digits and up for WWII is clearly significant). notable per SOLDIER: " Played an important role in a significant military event such as a major battle or campaign" - kill counts of these magnitude are a significant material and personnel (aviation - expensive to train) advantage. Soviets were competitive in the air from the end of 1942 and onward - and in event taking out a regiment sized enemy force - Aviation regiment (Soviet Union) single handed is significant regardless of opposition quality.Icewhiz (talk) 10:39, 23 April 2017 (UTC)