| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alberto Grandi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Photo needed
editThe article is missing a photo of its subject, which should preferably be recent. See WP:IMG, WP:IUP, WP:C. -The Gnome (talk) 05:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Political Candidate in 2002??
editThe Italian Wikipedia lists a person named Alberto Grandi as a 2002 candidate for a leading (mayor?) position in Busto Arsizio: it:Elezioni comunali in Lombardia del 2002#Busto Arsizio. This candidate lost the elections against a right-wing candidate. Does anyone know whether this political candidate Alberto Grandi is the Lemma person of this article? --Himbeerbläuling (talk) 09:03, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
Falsehoods
editIn my opinion it makes no sense to publish articles in an encyclopedia stating that the real Parmigiano Reggiano comes from Wisconsin, that pizza and carbonara are American, and other very serious nonsense from a very sensationalist professor; it's clear that these are absurd falsehoods. JacktheBrown (talk) 19:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
edits
editHey, JacktheBrown, you've made some edits here that I'm very concerned about. You removed a source for the year of birth, here, but left the full date; the cite should have been left but the day/month removed as uncited. Here you removed cites to Fox and Financial Times with an edit summary of "Removed bias references", leaving content unsourced. The correct move if you think refs are dubious would be to mark these as better source needed, but why did you think they were biased? Here you added into the lead that he's "controversial" with no source, no edit summary, no statement of that assertion within the article. Here you removed a see also without explanation. Here you removed a whole bunch of sources, leaving a ton of content -- entire paragraphers, nearly the entire 'controversies' section -- uncited, with an edit summary "removed repetitive references". Let's talk. Valereee (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2024 (UTC)