Talk:Albion, Nebraska

Latest comment: 8 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Albion, Nebraska/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

==As of September 10, 2008==

I rated Albion a Stub-class article due in part to two things: the absence of any real information on the city, meaning it needs good sections on history, economy, recreation, education, and government, and the fact that it has a trivia section, which is frowned upon in Wikipedian society. The trivia section needs to be split up, and new sections need to be added before further comments can be added.

I rated this a Low-importance article because of its small population and relative anonymity on an international scale.

--Starstriker7(Say hior see my works) 23:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 23:03, 10 September 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Albion, Nebraska. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:17, 7 October 2016 (UTC)Reply