Talk:Alekseyev I-21/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 15:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Will take this one. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 15:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

• Lead and infobox; all good
• Section 1;
  • What is OKB-21? Mention the basic context to get an idea
  • Mention the units in full on the first mention, kgf, lbf, mm etc.
  • abbreviate "2,000 kilograms (4,400 lb) to 2,300 kilograms (5,100 lb)"
• Section 6;
  • Green, William & Swanborough; was never used, remove or move it to further reading section
• 0% confidence, well done.

Very well written short and enough article.

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:07, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

All done. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 04:09, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

---

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 10:53, 2 February 2017 (UTC)