Talk:Alessandro Rolla

Original article

The original article was previously published by myself in http://www.viola-in-music.com/Alessandro-Rolla.html and I authorise its use here.
Viola in music 01:18, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

First viola concerto ever heard?

Telemann, whose concerto was written for viola and not viola da gamba or viola d'amore (to my knowledge), was already dead by that time. His concerto in G and concerto(s) for two violas was unknown to that writer, but the writer's claims are still false. Schissel | Sound the Note! 07:45, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

I now regret my too-hasty claims; Telemann's concerto may indeed have been originally for gamba- but I am not sure. Will have to look into that. Vanhal may have written his concertos for viola before Rolla, but it's possible they were for viola d'amore, like the Stamitz concertos. Needs looking into further, anycase. Sorry! Schissel | Sound the Note! 16:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

"List of Compositions" section needed

The Italian page http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alessandro_Rolla#Lavori has a good starter list of compositions by Rolla which might be profitably translated.

http://www.rolla.lim.di.unimi.it/opere.php (Italian) is even more complete.

The composer's complete catalogue of works was collated by "Bianchi-Inzaghi". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.0.193.12 (talk) 00:11, 5 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alessandro Rolla. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121106104503/http://www.naxos.com/mainsite/blurbs_reviews.asp?item_code=8.572010&catNum=572010&filetype=About%20this%20Recording&language=English to http://www.naxos.com/mainsite/blurbs_reviews.asp?item_code=8.572010&catNum=572010&filetype=About%20this%20Recording&language=English

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:39, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Date of birth

The majority of sources say 22 April, which is what we've gone with. A few say 23 April. And a small number, including Italian WP, say 6 April, .

Why the discrepancy, and what credence can be given to any of these versions? -- Jack of Oz ^{[pleasantries]} 22:07, 10 August 2021 (UTC)