Talk:Alex Belfield
This article was nominated for deletion on 30 January 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alex Belfield article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because the problem of insufficient reliably sourced information has been rectified. Andysmith248 (talk) 14:13, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because the subject meets WP:PERPETRATOR, a factor that was not considered in the AfD. Also, the article isn't eligible for CSD G4 as the current page has been expanded since its previous deletion. - GA Melbourne (talk) 14:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Potential bias
editThe tone of this article is a bit off to me, with a few quotes where this guy is talking about things like a ‘witch hunt’ against him and the claim that he’s ‘anti-establishment’ - a nebulous term at best. It’s worth noting that this man is noted mostly for his criminal offences, not his broadcasting career and certainly not a YouTube channel he subsequently set up. 2A01:B340:84:3A7:FDBA:ACE2:9BFA:6E55 (talk) 17:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
Severity of sentence
editFive years imprisonment for stalking seems excessive. Is there a reason for this severity which should be in the article? 2A00:23C8:9FF6:DC01:D860:FAB8:BD2E:552F (talk) 19:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- The maximum penalty for a single count of stalking has been ramped up in previous years (it only became a criminal offence in 2012 with a maximum term of five years, and this was increased to ten years in 2017), and he was convicted on four counts, so probably not. This guy got 9 years, and you can find multiple examples of people getting 1-3 year terms for single counts. Black Kite (talk) 12:09, 28 August 2023 (UTC)