Talk:Alex Hewit/GA2

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Fails 1a and 1b. Prose is choppy with overlong paragraphs. Lead section contains minor details. Fails 3a and 3b. Doesn't cover main aspects of his career, especially life outside lacrosse. Other times it while goes into unnecessary detail, such as meeting his teammate. Fails 6. - Mnnlaxer (mistakenly unsigned)

I don't know, the article seems ok to me... It's a good article, not a featured article, and the prose seems ok at this level. 3a and 3b - the article is pretty much entirely about his career, what do you think is missing? It's not mandatory for good articles to contain illustrations: "Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio" Cavie78 (talk) 14:04, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

It does seem ok, but is that a description of a GA? I'm fairly strict on GA. I don't think it is comprehensive enough while padding with trivial info. Frankly, I know length isn't a criteria, but it matters to me. I'm not going to die on the hill of delisting this article, but it certainly could be vastly improved without coming close to an A or FA. Could you work on improving it? Give it a once over and then I'll do what I can. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 15:53, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

@Cavie78 and Mnnlaxer: Where does this stand now? AIRcorn (talk) 05:17, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

I'm fine with passing it. - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 20:35, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Ok for me Cavie78 (talk) 22:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)