Talk:Alex Kurtzman

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Roxy the dog in topic Inappropriate editorial comment in the lead


edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alex Kurtzman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:14, 17 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Inappropriate editorial comment in the lead

edit

"Alexander Hilary Kurtzman . . . is an American film and television writer, producer, and director. He is best known for ruining the Star Trek franchise . . ."

While I don't necessarily disagree with the sentiment, it is clearly inappropriate for a Wikipedia biography that is supposed to be objectively written and neutral in tone. Such comments should be reserved for a biographical section recounting the subject's professional work, and perhaps including quoted critiques of that work from published and notable third-party sources. Cheers. 2600:1700:4D0:8780:A96B:E9D3:C974:BF09 (talk) 17:58, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

No need for a ruddy great explanation, just revert it. I've done it twice now, the twit doing it will get sorted if they continue, and if they stop, well ... -Roxy the grumpy dog. wooF 18:32, 14 May 2022 (UTC)Reply