This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alexander Bethell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article needs expanding to reflect actual C-class. The liberal promotion of start-class to C-class, ignoring one criteria, the very first sentence in the assessment for C-class, also found in the template reflects: The article is substantial. All arguments aside, we need to
1)- ensure a C-class is obtained before promoting,
2)- expand prematurely promoted articles,
3)- reassess articles that are clearly wrongly classed.
If we allow, or continue to allow, start-class articles to be prematurely promoted to C-class, this does not really give any incentive for article expansion, pretty much does away with start-class as adding an info box and possibly two sections would bring all stub-class articles directly to C-class, and the results are that it downgrades our classification criteria.
This article has far more references than many elevated start-class that sometimes contain only a single source, has a good info box with an image, and the subject is notable so there should be plenty of source for expansion. I will add it to my list for possible future expansion. Otr500 (talk) 16:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
.svg)
