Talk:Alexander Gauland
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alexander Gauland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Untitled
editIt seems Gauland has a law degree but is not a legal scholar - at least there's no indication of an academic career given here. This might be an issue of translation confusion. The German term 'Jurist' indicates nothing more than a law degree. Does anyone know more?
176.250.246.127 (talk) 22:17, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi, the first paragraph seems pretty wired. If he's a German wawyer he must have both "Juristische Staatsexamem" or legal state examinations otherwise he could not be admitted to the bar, i.e he wouldn't be a lawyer. It's just odd to mention that someone has two legal state examinations in the way it's done in this article. It sounds like it's something special while in reality it's just the normal case for jurist in Germany. If one says in Germany you're a jurist people will usully assume that this person has done both exams. Though, it's not necessarly the case and some folks who didn't do or pass the 2nd legal state examination still call themselves a "jurist" which is formally perfectly fine. To sum this up, if the first paragraph would just state he's a German lawyer, ... it would be fine. If one would want to go into more detail - say in the education section or wherever but not in the first paragraph, one could say where he studied and took the first legal state examination and where he did the "Referendariat" - his legal practical training - and took the second legal state examination. 86.30.180.40 (talk) 10:03, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Bias
editSomeone keeps adding words like 'racist' and 'xenophobic' to descriptions of Gauland's and the AfD's policies. It is one thing to discuss these as charges levelled at Gauland, with reference to who made these allegations; it is quite another to state them as undisputed, impartial fact. It's much more accurate and less divisive to use words like 'conservative' and 'anti-immigration', etc. Especially if you keep in mind that Mr. Gauland has spent 40 years as a loyal member of the then conservative Christian Democrats.80.131.52.22 (talk) 02:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Depression
editThis article states that Gauland suffered depression after having 'passed' a state exam. Is that correct, or did he in fact 'fail' the exam? I am not a German speaker but using Google translate on the source I was able to discover only that he suffered depression after taking the exam; the outcome (pass or fail) of his exam was not stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.147.182.16 (talk) 01:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Pejorative terms
editFeel it is more appropriate to describe Gauland as 'right wing' rather than use the pejorative term 'far right' PompeyTheGreat (talk) 07:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)