Talk:Alexander Zverev/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Kosack in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 13:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply


I'll take this one, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 13:12, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Inital review

Lead

edit
  • WP:OVERLINK discourages linking things like nations that have little relevance to the article. I would say Germany in the opening sentence is a prime example of that.
  • won one Junior Grand Slam singles title at the 2014 Australian Open, if that's his only junior title  perhaps a junior Grand Slam would be more appropriate? It also avoids it sounding like there was more than one title at the Australian Open.

Early life

edit
  • I enjoy it still, I enjoyed it back then. So, yeah – that’s how I started playing, are these last two sentences of the quote necessary? They don't seem to add any further and the last is basically repeating the opening sentence of the paragraph.
  • as a kid, a little informal. As a child perhaps?

2016

edit

2017

edit

2019

edit

Personal life

edit

Career statistics

edit

References

edit

A big article, well detailed and very well written. Not much I can really find to concern me. Placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review, Kosack! I addressed everything above and also updated the 2019 sections. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 07:20, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Follow up

edit
  • In the first paragraph of the 2016 section, it states his victory over Cilic was the highest ranked opponent he had ever defeated. However, in the final paragraph of 2015 it says he defeated no. 1 Djokovic at the Boodles Challenge exhibition?

@Sportsfan77777: I think that's it from me. One final issue above and I'm happy to approve this. Kosack (talk) 20:25, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Kosack: Yay! I answered above. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 21:16, 2 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Happy to promote this. Well written, comprehensive and suitably sourced. Scores a little high on the copyvio detector but there are several sizeable quotes that account for the majority of this. Promoting. Kosack (talk) 06:17, 3 May 2019 (UTC)Reply