Talk:Alexandre de Rhodes

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 142.163.195.124 in topic dates and feasts

Alexandre de Rhodes' nationality

edit

Alexandre Rhodes was not a French national. He was born and grew up in Avignon, which was at that time Papal States, and which had never been French until 1791. Therefore, please review the article about his nationality.

What would be his nationality, if any, then? olivier 11:06, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
He might have been a French national, but not a French subject. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.176.120.156 (talk) 19:28, 11 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

has several facts wrong!

edit

Hello! If the source for this page has several facts wrong, please at least tell here which and give your alternative source too.

That's how! -- DLL .. T 21:45, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply


The controversy part is so wrong and uneducated. It was the bishop Pigneau de Behaine who sought a military alliance between the Nguyen prince and France in order to defeat the Tay Son party and protect the Christian establishments. That alliance was agreed by Louis XVI and signed with prince Canh in 1787. But France's financial mess was a stumbling obstacle. Governor Thomas Conway of Pondicherry delayed the help. Bishop Pigneau lobbied French merchants of Pondicherry for funds and logistic support. He bribed many officers for desertion and hired mercenaries among cipoys and got Fillipinos troops to fill and rank.

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. The old history at Alexandre de Rhodes moved to Talk:Alexandre de Rhodes/old. Jenks24 (talk) 09:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)Reply



Alexander de RhodesAlexandre de Rhodes – The French form is overwhelmingly preferred in sources. Check for yourself. Srnec (talk) 23:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Survey

edit

Discussion

edit
Any additional comments:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Status of Avignon

edit

I've added 'now in' in front of France, as the status of Avignon was rather changeable up to the Revolution. Strictly a papal territory, it was in the hands of the French monarchy from time to time. I think my addition covers most possibilities. Peridon (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alexandre de Rhodes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stamps

edit

also 1961: http://vietnamcollector.com/south-vietnam/300-death-anniversary-of-father-alexandre-de-rhodes/ --2607:FEA8:D5DF:1AF0:B147:D7B2:68E3:F339 (talk) 19:31, 30 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

dates and feasts

edit

I don't see the usefulness of including Catholic feasts after the dates. And e.g. Visitation is no longer July 2. So unless there is specific relevance I suggest they be removed as original research. 142.163.195.124 (talk) 20:38, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply