Talk:Alexis Soyer/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Chiswick Chap in topic GA Review
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 18:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Tim, will get to this soon, probably tomorrow. Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:27, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- CC - have a look at the Reform kitchen pic: almost good enough for a GA for that alone - that's what I call a kitchen!! Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 19:01, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- That's me centre right. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- I'm front and centre: sweeping up the rubbish! - SchroCat (talk) 19:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
- That's me centre right. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:03, 17 January 2023 (UTC)
Comments
edit- Wikilink Elizabeth David, Queen Victoria. We seem to have no coverage of Elizabeth Ray (no, not that one), shameful.
- Oh yes we do, Elizabeth Ray (food writer) redirects to Cyril Ray. Please link. I've listed her books there now, but she does deserve a bit more of a word really.
- Personally, I'd crop some of the frame area from the portrait of Emma Jones, but it's not a requirement.
- You might like to add the name of the artist, Henry Bryan Hall, to the portrait of Emma Jones.
- Why don't we include a portrait of Fanny Cerito? Clearly relevant. It'll only necessitate slight rearrangement of other images.
- Wikilink The Times at first instance, not the second.
A gourmet and a consistent Whig supporter of reforming legislation in the House of Lords, Ailsa was a prominent freemason and it is possible that it was he who introduced Soyer to the organisation, in which he remained for the rest of his life.
is a bit long, perhaps split the sentence.
I'll note that the images are all correctly licensed. I can't see any issue with the citations.
Summary
editWhat a splendid article. As you can see, I have only the most minimal of comments. I think I know where it's headed next, and I wish it a speedy journey. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:12, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.