Talk:Alfa Aesar

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Declared COI

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Note I created this page, and I do have a WP:COI. I have carefully tried to be as neutral as possible, and just stick to the facts. Please let me know if you find anything I add to be too POV. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:38, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Verifciation problems

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

And I'd better point out that little of the information I've just added is verifiable as there are NO public documents available, except possibly press reports about the MTM trials, and maybe press reports of the second LS fire. Its all true - I was there - but like so many things when you're talking of businesses, the records never happened!Olddemdike (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Advert flag removal

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've taken the advert flag off this as, while Ron may be a current employee, I'm very definately not. Most of the article was written by myself (not Ron) using personal knowledge, which is the weak point: as I mentioned before, its impossible to verify most of this as the records only exist in my memory. If you read the article I don't think you can mistake it for an advert! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olddemdike (talk • contribs) 01:51, 13 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic