Talk:Alfa Laval

Untitled

diary farming ?

I assume dairy farming.

This article desperately needs citation sources! Heritagefarm (talk) 16:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Article needs no citations; it was copied almost entirely from http://www.alfalaval.com/about-us/our-company/history/Pages/History.aspx Heritagefarm (talk) 16:06, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: http://www.manufacturingdigital.com/company-reports/alfa-laval. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MER-C 12:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Maritime Student Contribution

My angle of research was maritime focused. Article needs further development on Alfa Laval's contribution to the Energy and Food industries.

Competitors

I do not think it is correct to call Doosan Alfa Laval's main competitor. In my opinion a company like GEA or SPX has much more overlap in product offering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RealRoy (talk • contribs) 14:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

2008 Titanium theft

I edited the paragraph to refer to the theft of Titanium not titan and tweaked some grammar that suggested that it was contained in two trailers that "drove themselves to Poland". I have no knowledge of that but I suspect there was some human involvement...!

In order to confirm the metal that was stolen I found this article from a firm of Swedish lawyers "Setterwalls" which to me confirms that the theft took place and additionally the Company had to take a case to court in order to get an insurance policy to be paid out for it.SlySven (talk) 02:27, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alfa Laval. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715005255/http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/6276310/alfa-laval-consolidates-manufacturing-of-boilers-in-asia to http://www.istockanalyst.com/business/news/6276310/alfa-laval-consolidates-manufacturing-of-boilers-in-asia

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Alfa Laval. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151025141542/http://local.alfalaval.com/en-gb/contact-us/pages/default.aspx to http://local.alfalaval.com/en-gb/contact-us/pages/default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:47, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• The centrifuge for separatingthe liquid from the dried pulp.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:07, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

New proposal for Alfa Laval article

• What I think should be changed (include citations):

I think the entire article needs updating and restructuring, including relevant citations.

• Why it should be changed:

The current article is unstructured, somewhat confusing, and lacks many citations. Instead of trying to fix one small part at a time, I have tried to rewrite the entire article to provide a better framework for future updates.

• References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

I have a proposal at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Alfa_Laval (it was moved from my Sandbox when I tried to submit it for approval, I don't know if that was correct of me or not, I am not experienced). I hope you will find that the article is not a promotional article, but factual, objective and much more structured and with better citations than before (still working on getting full citations for the CEO / Board member list).

Wittlock (talk) 08:22, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Moved my re-write proposal back to my Sandbox, since I got a decline on the Draft article due to the article already existing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wittlock/sandbox Wittlock (talk) 09:11, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

References

@Wittlock: I'd like to help you, but the sources are problematic. Anything that is controlled by a company such as their web site or press release is considered a primary source, and is therefore not reliable. See WP:RS. This can be problematic, but the idea is that if the info doesn't appear anywhere else except where the company writes about it, it's not notable. Company financial reports, such as the 10-K in the US, get a pass, since they are theoretically reviewed by an outside auditor. Sometimes the number and locations of offices can be sourced to a company locations info page on their website, since that's generally not controversial. If you can change the sourcing to eliminate Alfa Laval sources like their web site and press releases, and the sites of their partners, you'll have a better chance of this being reviewed and implemented. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:15, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made.  TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:24, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

I have closed this edit request, per above. Z1720 (talk) 16:03, 6 June 2022 (UTC)