Talk:Alfred Bog
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Alfred Bog appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 July 2015, and was viewed approximately 2,657 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
"high-quality"
editWhat does this mean? What scale is the quality rated against? The Rambling Man (talk) 11:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Source doesn't specify, but it must mean healthy or unspoiled in this context. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:04, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- "healthy"? How is that defined in "bog terms"? The Rambling Man (talk) 13:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- P199 are you suggesting you don't know what the term means? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:28, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- I don't know any more than what the source provided. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Ok, good to know. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:31, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
'The bog is considered the largest high-quality bog in Southern Ontario '
editWho wrote this? This bog is in Eastern Ontario, not Southern Ontario. Even someone unfamiliar with the bog can see from the map that it is not in Southern Ontario. Grandma Roses (talk) 21:58, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Southern Ontario is considered everything south of Algonquin park, just click the link! Eastern Ontario is a sub-section of southern Ontario. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
I have lived in Eastern Ontario for most of my life (64 years.) NEVER have I read or heard that Eastern Ontario is part of Southern Ontario. Your link had NO references for the claim that Eastern Ontario - or any other region - is part of Southern Ontario. Do you live here??> Grandma Roses (talk) 13:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- There are many things we never hear in our lives. But this is great, you learned something new today! -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Can you provide a reliable citation for your position? There is none in the article on Southern Ontario. I cannot learn something which isn't a real fact. Grandma Roses (talk) 14:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- "Southern Ontario" is not an official region with designated or legislated boundaries. But here are at least 4 government agencies that show that they consider Southern Ontario as everything south of the Mattawa/French Rivers or Algonquin Park: Ontario Travel (official tourism site), MTO, Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario), and Environment Canada. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Your first link does not mention anything east of Peterborough. Your second one includes parts that are not included in 'south of Algonquin Park.' Your third is a federal agency, which has no authority to delineate provincial boundaries, and your fourth, also a federal agency, does not use the term Southern Ontario. I can provide links, too, to show that Eastern Ontario is a distinct entity. We will just have to agree to disagree. Grandma Roses (talk) 16:22, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Can you provide a reliable citation for your position? There is none in the article on Southern Ontario. I cannot learn something which isn't a real fact. Grandma Roses (talk) 14:33, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alfred Bog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150618235844/http://www.railways.incanada.net/Articles/Article2000_1.html to http://www.railways.incanada.net/Articles/Article2000_1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 1 July 2017 (UTC)