A fact from Alfred Ngaro appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 December 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DYK nomination
editRecent Removal
editThere was a recent removal of information. How notable does a vote need to be before it can be added to an article about a politician?
http://www.cookislandsnews.com/item/52478-nz-bill-failed-miserably/52478-nz-bill-failed-miserably
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/113461/pacific-mps-divided-on-same-sex-marriage-bill
http://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/223544/50000-sign-petition-against-gay-marriage
http://www.newswire.co.nz/2012/08/long-time-mps-change-colours-to-rainbow/
http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/local-news/7577053/Gay-marriage-bill-passes-first-reading
Incredtent (talk) 06:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- @[user:Incredtent]] The question was not notable but encyclopedic. A random (how did you choose what you you added and what POV was behind it?) list of some of the many many things an MP has voted on is not particularly encyclopedic and - it smacks of WP:NEWS and verging on original research. If you want to deal with an MPs politics the encyclopedic way to do it is find a commentary by a journalist or an academic that discusses the individual and work off that. This is way more likely to be encyclopedic and NPOV. Secondary sources are always better than primary ones and some of the refs above are pretty light weight ones. Andrewgprout (talk) 07:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- I ask again. How notable does a vote need to be before it can be added to an article about a politician? Incredtent (talk) 06:27, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- A user at the WikiProject New Zealand/politics talk page agreed with the inclusion of conscience vote so I have added it back in.Incredtent (talk) 06:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- I concur that in a general sense, conscience votes are always worthy to include in political bios. Schwede66 02:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alfred Ngaro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120204010618/http://www.elections.org.nz/elections/2011-general-election-and-referendum/party-lists.html to http://www.elections.org.nz/elections/2011-general-election-and-referendum/party-lists.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)