Talk:Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed

Freemesm's removal of relevant and cited material from the article

User:Freemesm has decided to remove a sentence that presented material with extensive citations, discussing the critical stance of the international community towards the tribunal that is trying Mujahid. He gave no justification aside from its being 'blame'. He seems out to push a POV of defending the tribunal. I am trying to push an NPOV that situates the alleged war criminal in the context of his tribunal. Aminul802 (talk) 03:22, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Dear Aminul, you are just trying to bias this article by blaming ICTB. Which is totally irrelevant here. Look at the article with free mind. There are no references about Ali Ahsan Mujahid's biography info. But you come here with the broken record of 'Criticizing ICTB'. This is not wiki POV manner. I think this article don't have the ability to stay in wikipedia.--Freemesm (talk) 11:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Hi Freemesm, I've requested of another editor to comment here [1]. I shall await their input. Aminul802 (talk) 03:56, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I'm waiting for his opinion.--Freemesm (talk) 15:40, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

• I have edited the article which should cover due weight and BLP. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:35, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

I think the current version is best and is neutral. I can't see one of the sources, but this source does cover the defense, and allows the page to provide both viewpoints. Going forward I'd like to find more sources that cover Mujahid in particular so the article can be expanded. Dreambeaver(talk) 19:32, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Darkness Shines, thanks to your effort, the article in its present state meets almost all the BLP criteria. I've therefore removed the BLP sources notice. Also I've moved the article to the correct title. BengaliHindu (talk) 11:56, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ali Ahsan Mohammad Mojaheed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130720213409/http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2013-07-17/news/368562 to http://www.prothom-alo.com/detail/date/2013-07-17/news/368562
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140429215712/http://www.banglanews24.com/English/detailsnews.php?nssl=6a307655ba6a4f31e4f2da46d7516c84&nttl=2012040237679 to http://www.banglanews24.com/English/detailsnews.php?nssl=6a307655ba6a4f31e4f2da46d7516c84&nttl=2012040237679

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Anything else?

Is There Anything Else? BangladeshiEditorInSylhet (talk) 07:00, 28 September 2024 (UTC)