Talk:Ali Qapu

File:Ali Qapu night.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Ali Qapu night.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 8 January 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD

Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:Ālī Qāpū in golden time.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for September 8, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-09-08. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:44, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Ālī Qāpū is an imperial palace in Isfahan, Iran, built in the late 16th century. The palace served as the official residence of Persian emperors of the Safavid dynasty. In 1979, UNESCO inscribed the palace and the adjoining Naqsh-e Jahan Square as a World Heritage Site due to their cultural and historical importance. This panoramic photograph of Ālī Qāpū, captured using high-dynamic-range imaging during the golden hour, consists of twenty-five frames digitally merged together.

Photograph credit: Amir Pashaei

Recently featured:

• Howell Cobb
• Marie-Gabrielle Capet
• Orange-headed thrush

Requested move 26 June 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus to move as proposed. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vpab15 (talk) 20:33, 20 July 2022 (UTC)

---

• Ālī Qāpū → Ali Qapu
• Ali Qapu → Ali Qapu (disambiguation)

– Per WP:COMMONNAME; English language sources don't use the diacritics in this case. Example from UNESCO's website: "The pavilion of Ali Qapu on the west side forms the monumental entrance to the palatial zone and to the royal gardens which extend behind it." This argument can be further supported by WP:TITLECON; Ali Qapu Gate, Qazvin, and Ali Qapu, Ardabil are two examples where the very same name has been transliterated without the diacritics. It seems that the diacritics were added to distinguish it from the disambiguation page Ali Qapu, which I suggest be moved to Ali Qapu (disambiguation) (as it's already a redirect to that page). Keivan.f^Talk 08:26, 26 June 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 13:22, 3 July 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:22, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Converted from a technical request (permalink). – Uanfala (talk) 20:51, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

• Support. Judging from the pageviews, this appears to be primary topic, while a very quick look at Google Books results suggests that the spelling without the diacritics is indeed more common. – Uanfala (talk) 20:55, 26 June 2022 (UTC)
• Weak Support Support removal of the diacritics. But wondering why "palace" is missing from the title when our box and description identify it as "Ali Qapu Palace", as do practically all tourist sites. Walrasiad (talk) 02:23, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
• Relister comment Relisting one more time due to an additional suggestion to add the word "Palace" into the name that came late in the discussion. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 05:23, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wiki Education assignment: Piety, Power, and Propaganda. Art and Architectural History of the Islamic

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2024 and 1 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ashah518 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: TiaIvy, Nta317.

— Assignment last updated by TiaIvy (talk) 23:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Building classification

The bibliography + UNESCO listing + single good ref here about the structure in general (the other one is a noncredible blog about coins) state the structure to be a gate/monumental entrance to the larger Safavid palace complex/district. This is clearly mentioned twice in the first two paragraphs, but the article calls it an "imperial palace" in the first sentence and nearly goes out of its way to call it a "palace" and "imperial residence" everywhere else, including the infobox. Since it is, apparently, a very large gate with rooms in it, it should be described as such and not mentioned as a palace in itself. The Safavid palace complex itself strangely does not have an article, but that is a separate issue. PhilosophicalSomething (talk) 01:17, 26 April 2024 (UTC)