This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
This article is within the scope of the Discographies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's collection of discography articles and lists. If you would like to participate please visit the project page. Any questions pertaining to discography-related articles should be directed to the project's talk page.DiscographiesWikipedia:WikiProject DiscographiesTemplate:WikiProject DiscographiesDiscography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndustrialWikipedia:WikiProject IndustrialTemplate:WikiProject IndustrialIndustrial music articles
@TheBlinkster:, great to see some of these articles get leads...looking good - would be good if a bit larger. Any albums/singles win awards or charted particularly highly. A bit on that and we are good I think. Cas Liber (talk·contribs) 03:02, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, thanks for the feedback. ASF are kind of a cult band and as noted on their main article talk page there was already a discussion as to whether they're even worthy of a Discog page. While I agree that (a) they are notable enough to be on Wiki and (b) they also meet the criteria for a discog page as noted on the main article talk page, the problem you then run into is that there may not be anything all that smashing about their discography in terms of big hits, award winners etc. I'm not sure that their album making it to 100 on the UK charts once is worthy of special note and in fact it might even look a bit silly to say that in an article. I also suspect that maybe that is why the page didn't have a big lead in the first place. However, I'll have another look and see if I can come up with anything more to add. TheBlinkster (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Fixed it...fortunately Barry Lazell wrote a book or all the 80s indie chart toppers would be lost to time, since those indie charts weren't really compiled anywhere central till he did it. I won't post a new diff at the contest since you "helped" with suggestions here, thanks again. TheBlinkster (talk) 17:04, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Whoops, looks like I have to put the new diff in order to get the check mark, ok, I'll do it the same as the other guy two down on the entry page did TheBlinkster (talk) 17:27, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
