Talk:Alison Maclean
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 5 September 2019 and 4 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Patelcamps4608. Peer reviewers: Ayee667, Wikistellar96, Donut12345.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Peer Review
editI took a look at your article and overall, I think you did a great job when it came to contributing content to Maclean's career section. No sections are excessive and I feel you did a good job of summarizing the person's work without adding too many details. The one exception to this may be when you mention their film and then a further sentence and details about the many actors that starred in it. A specific example of this was when writing about Jesus' Son. Still, the many films you mentioned and their accompanying information provide insight into the person's work even if there is not a separate Wikipedia page to mention such knowledge which is helpful. The only other suggestion I have is to potentially organize your article's career section better. This could be by film or even easier, by year with sub-headings so you can still speak on all of the person's career events during a period without seeming like you are jumping from film to film. I linked a couple of the locations that were mentioned throughout the article and once again wanted to say great effort on this page! Wikistellar96 (talk) 00:37, 1 November 2019 (UTC)
Peer Review
editNot sure if we were supposed to put the peer reviews here so I guess I'll just take a moment to summarize my thoughts here as well. The added charts look great. The information in the career section is a bit overpowering, and redundant (because there are already articles about the films). On the other hand, all the links are great and work and the information about her awards is important. So overall, great job! Your article looks great. Donut12345 (talk) 20:42, 5 November 2019 (UTC)