This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I think a lot of the bibliography should be removed and a link to her CV be used instead. Plus, of course, we need a good summary of her research. Shaslang (talk) 03:47, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Shaslang: - you're right on all points. Most of the bibliography should be pruned, and what remains should be converted to prose. Her CV (assuming it's available online) makes an excellent source for a lot of information in the article, and interested people can click through to see the whole thing. And we definitely need a good summary of her research - ideally one intelligible to someone without a huge philosophy background, although that guideline is a bit flexible. Kevin Gorman (talk) 23:10, 15 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
@Kevin Gorman: Thanks! I'll work on a good summary at some point and will link to the CV. I'm wondering, though, whether taking material off her own website counts as plagiarism on Wikipedia, if we also put a reference to it? What are the norms about using material the author herself has produced in her bio? Shaslang (talk) 00:38, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Shaslang: - we can't copy material absolutely directly off her website unless she's comfortable releasing it under a CC-by-SA license, but her website is definitely appropriate as a source. Wikipedia treats plagiarism and attribution in a very similar way to how academia does, and if you follow what you've done in your academic career I doubt you'll run in to many problems. We tend to frown on too many block quote and we take a narrow approach to fair use, but there are relatively few other differences. In summarizing her research, you may want to read over WP:NOR, and also remember that Wikipedia really prefers secondary sources (people talking about her research) to primary sources (i.e., papers she's published herself. Her CV is an absolutely appropriate source for stuff like career and education details though. It's much easier to write about academics when they happen to put their CV's online. Kevin Gorman (talk) 01:08, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
.jpg){kind=small}