Talk:All About Love: New Visions
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Simulo in topic More secondary sources needed
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:44, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
More secondary sources needed
editThere is an over-reliance on primary sources in this article Tenuous tree (talk) 14:33, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- I agree – I did search a bit, but could not find many secondary sources that talk about the book itself (rather than citing something from it). The New York Times had a review in 2000 and Associated Press recently (March '24) published an article on the books lasting impact. Simulo (talk) 09:12, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Grammar and structural problems
editThe format and content doesn't fit the usual Wikipedia structure for books. There are also multiple grammar errors such as sentences beginning without capitalization. Overall, it wasn't up to most Wikipedia article standards. TonyRoni (talk) 20:23, 22 March 2023 (UTC)