Talk:All Souls' Church, Cameron Highlands

edit

Am I not the only one who thinks this place isn't notable enough to have an article? However, I must say how well written this article is. 94.171.75.101 (talk) 10:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

You could well be right, but it is nicely written so I just let it pass. There are lots of articles on small churches in the Western world, and the English Wikipedia is pretty biased against representing foreign institutions. Jamesx12345 (talk) 12:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
I do not think this article should be deleted. It is well written, fully cited, illustrated, and linked to several other WP pages. In fact, there is enough substance that the "no reason to think this particular church is notable" tag seems a little insulting. Keep the article. — Molly-in-md (talk) 15:16, 3 February 2014 (UTC)Reply


Every church is a living organism. This is a well documents, well researched write up. It's not about the building or organization but the people. It shows that even though we may not all be on "front page news" , we can all do something significant in life. They did leave a legacy that will outlast lifetimes, this page should stay, Simon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simon Chua (talkcontribs) 06:32, 9 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on All Souls' Church, Cameron Highlands. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:08, 2 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:36, 20 April 2019 (UTC)Reply