Talk:All You Had to Do Was Stay/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 05:33, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · contribs) 15:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Overall, article is well-written but a few fine-tuning needed. Stays on-topic, no recent edit conflicts and of acceptable length.

• Avoid the awkward repetition of "song" in "Lyrically, the song is a breakup song that samples a panicked Swift shouting the word, "stay", throughout the song," ... eg "breakup anthem", "throughout the song" → "throughout its runtime/duration/length"
• clarify, "including the masters of Swift's albums that the label had released." → "including the masters of Swift's albums released under the label.:
• ce, "could have been mistaken to be sung by" → "could have been mistaken for one sung by"

Sources and verifiability pending. Ping when done.Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 21:04, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

@Ippantekina, hi, are you going to respond to the comments soon? It's been over a week since my last comment so I'm ready to close if it the nomination doesn't carry forward. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:14, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

@Dora the Axe-plorer: sorry didn't know you finished the review. Could you please place it "on hold" so I'm notified of it? Ippantekina (talk) 11:44, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Sure no worries and thanks for getting back Swiftly. Status is "on hold" as requested. Lt me know again once you're done, cheers! Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 12:40, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Spot checks and sourcing are good to go. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 12:42, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! I've addressed all your points accordingly :) Ippantekina (talk) 07:47, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

Okay that clears it all, I can give this nomination a pass. Thanks! Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 10:25, 29 July 2024 (UTC)