 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 15:50, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
All For Nothing? → All for Nothing? – Since this is a television series, it should be moved per MOS:CT. Aspects (talk) 14:46, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Agree – This is the only article titled All For Nothing?. Bob Mono (talk) 21:16, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support No need for a discussion, when it's used as a preposition, "for" should never be capitalised. Unreal7 (talk) 16:41, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose & Support & Question - (Am a little confused) 1st thought reading the request at Wikipedia:Requested moves/Current discussions: How are you applying MOS:CT to this? Then come here and saw the requested change is different. I agree with removing the cap from "for", but disagree with removing "(TV Show)".--Education does not equal common sense. 我不在乎 20:36, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
- The question mark is disambiguation enough. e.g. Where Is the Love and Where Is the Love?. Unreal7 (talk) 22:24, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
Support - Heck, even capitalization can be considered adequate disambiguation. Marcus Qwertyus 10:07, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.