This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
All in a Row is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism articles
Latest comment: 5 years ago6 comments3 people in discussion
The user who created this page is known to display a particular bias against people who criticize the use of the "medical model of disability" for autism spectrum disorders. As such, I have concerns about this page, including the use of the terms "severely autistic" and "profoundly autistic"; the words "severely" and "profoundly" are connotative, not neutral (as opposed to words like "nonspeaking" or "dyspraxic"). I would also point out that the play was not criticized for not showing a milder form of autism. Nothing in the cited article says that; it's completely false. Anomalapropos (talk) 16:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
I've made a couple edits, but I'll return to make some more. In addition to the above, I also believe that the entire last section is unnecessary. I'm pretty sure we don't need a rehash of what the autism spectrum means. There's a Wiki page for that.
Also, lines such as "the autistic character in this play is at the severe end of the spectrum, and this disturbed some people in the neurodiversity movement" are, again, false. How the character experienced autism was not what was upsetting to the "neurodiversity movement." Once more, nothing in the cited article supports this assertion of fact, and I am suspicious of the term "disturbed."
Please note: "[Wikipedia is] not a soapbox on which to expound your personal theories or a battleground to debate controversial issues." Anomalapropos (talk) 17:19, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Further update from me: I've basically rehashed most of the information on the page, and I think it looks okay. If there were any responses from the cast and crew of the play to the criticisms in the very last section, I think those would be a good final addition for the moment. Anomalapropos (talk) 21:14, 14 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good. But just to let you know, most details should be cited, see WP:VERIFY. Also, 2606:5580:30C:7F9E:54FD:FFA1:4069:2EAA was me under an IP, I just forgot to log in. Ylevental (talk) 11:57, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
