Talk:Allegiance (Firewind album)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Andrzejbanas in topic Assessment comment

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Allegiance (Firewind album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Article requirements:


 Y Start: A reasonably complete infobox
    Y B: Complete with cover art and most technical details
 Y Start: A lead section giving an overview of the album
    Y B: At least one other section of prose
 Y Start: A track listing
    Y B: Containing track lengths and authors for all songs
 Y Start: A list of personnel
    Y B: Full list, including technical personnel and guest musicians
 Y Start: Categorisation at least by artist and year

==Re-assessment== Start class:

  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
  •  Y A track listing
  •  Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  •  Y All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B class:

  •  Y All the C class criteria
  •  Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  •  N No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  •  Y No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Good job! My only complaint is that the review for Kerrang is uncited and the citations from the Firewind website are good except the links at the bottom don't look to the page, in fact, they aren't links at all! I think that can be fixed. Update these and it can be moved up to a B class. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:48, 6 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 18:07, 6 July 2013 (UTC). Substituted at 07:23, 29 April 2016 (UTC)